Debunking erroneous allegations from the media is becoming a full time job (one that doesn’t pay very well). I wish the press didn’t depend on fabricating nonsense in order to make a living — sure would allow me to trust them more.

Two Men, two very different health care plans
Is it Romney’s position that coercive insurance directives are fine when they are imposed by states, and a “power grab’’ only when imposed by Congress? Does he oppose ObamaCare, with its maze of controls and penalties, as a matter of federalism — or as a matter of liberty?
I suggest Mr. Jacoby flip through the pages of Romney’s most recent book, where Romney discusses in-depth his stance on health care. Romney’s position on this issue has not wavered. There has been no “double speak”. He has not been “trying to have it both ways”.
Here are the hard facts on Romney’s health care stance:
Back to Jacoby’s piece where he makes the rehashed argument that Romney is to blame for ObamaCare by citing MIT economist Jonathan Gruber:
“If any one person in the world deserves credit for where we are now [with passage of the new federal law], it’s Mitt Romney. He designed the structure of the federal bill.’’
Oh really? Why, then, did Romney never get a phone call from Obama? As the supposed creator of ObamaCare, why was he never summoned to a health care summit? Why was he never given a white lab coat and told to pose in front of cameras at the white house? You would think that, as the expert on the matter, Romney would have been consulted at least over a text message or Skype. But no.

Where is Romney's Lab Coat?
I suppose I’m not entirely sure what Romney would have told Obama if he had gone to him for advice, but Romney did have this to say the day ObamaCare passed:
America has just witnessed an unconscionable abuse of power. President Obama has betrayed his oath to the nation — rather than bringing us together, ushering in a new kind of politics, and rising above raw partisanship, he has succumbed to the lowest denominator of incumbent power: justifying the means by extolling the ends. He promised better; we deserved better.
He calls his accomplishment “historic” — in this he is correct, although not for the reason he intends. Rather, it is an historic usurpation of the legislative process — he unleashed the nuclear option, enlisted not a single Republican vote in either chamber, bribed reluctant members of his own party, paid-off his union backers, scapegoated insurers, and justified his act with patently fraudulent accounting. What Barack Obama has ushered into the American political landscape is not good for our country; in the words of an ancient maxim, “what starts twisted, ends twisted.”
His health-care bill is unhealthy for America. It raises taxes, slashes the more private side of Medicare, installs price controls, and puts a new federal bureaucracy in charge of health care. It will create a new entitlement even as the ones we already have are bankrupt. For these reasons and more, the act should be repealed. That campaign begins today
Look folks, it’s easy to see where Mitt Romney stands on the issue. It doesn’t frustrate me that people are concerned with Mitt Romney’s past regarding health care, they have that right; what frustrates me is when certain people use their high profile press position to regurgitate false allegations, all the while knowing exactly where Mitt stands.
I, for one, cannot wait till the campaigning begins. Romney, having sharpened his debate skills, will be given plenty of air time to reinforce his health care stance for those who choose to remain ignorant. Granted, people like Jeff Jacoby will always find a way to contort Romney’s words — after all, if they can’t succeed in creating buzz they will be yanked from their post and replaced by somebody who can.









Excellent post Aaron.
Very convincing article! Keep up the good work!
Right on 4 Mitt…..
No need to hide anything, it’s all right there…..
Thanks
Absolutely excellent post Aaron. You kept it simple and nailed it! If only we had honesty in our media, Mitt would be in very good shape on this issue.
Jacoby employs the classic straw-man fallacy: assert Romney’s position erroneously, then refute it. Hopefully this abuse of the ignorant and misinformed by liberal columnists’ willful blindness will stop. Great post!
Aaron,
Thanks for your last two posts – they were really well-written. We really need this kind of info. out there. The mis-information on Mitt is so overwhelming – I appreciate you Gundys taking the time to write such thoughtful posts that speak for so many of us Mitt-heads!
@Aaron and others..
I cross-posted this at Race 4 2012. There may be some interesting comments over there to read as well.
http://race42012.com/2010/12/20/mitt-romney’s-supposed-health-care-straddle-is-he-trying-to-have-it-both-ways/#comments
I appreciate the comments, everyone! Sure is encouraging knowing people actually read these things :)
The best advice was to read “No Aplology”. Literally there in black and white.
@Christopher Casey You’re right, Christopher. Anyone wondering where Mitt stands on any major issue needs to read No Apology; it was undoubtedly written as a platform for a future presidential run.
Keep up the good… no!… keeping up the “excellent” writing Aaron. Some can speak for all of us better than we can for ourselves…and you are one of them. Well done! Thank you… Have read No Apology twice now to cement my support for Romney and recommend it to everyone.