Home > 2012 Election, Mitt Romney, Religion, Videos > The Mormon Church is Like…Trying to Help Mitt Romney Get Elected…or Something

The Mormon Church is Like…Trying to Help Mitt Romney Get Elected…or Something

August 12th, 2010 4:52 pm Author: Nate Gunderson

The LDS (Mormon) Church is at it again – trying to boost their image by running a very professional ad campaign. Of course the ever-suspicious minions presume there exists an ulterior motive, and it MUST be that the Mormons Church wants to put Mitt Romney in the White House.

I first started seeing this suggestion in spare tweets on Twitter a few days ago. Then came the rather silly Salon.com article (I say ‘silly’ because the author has a hard time obscuring his intent to raise suspicion of Mormons). Lastly there is a video news-clip (embedded below) from a local FOX affiliate in the Twin Cities, though the news clip is much more fair and objective.

I’ll highlight a few keywords and phrases from the Salon.com article that display the writers lack of objectivity: “weird middle-American Mormon ad campaign”, “nine seemingly randomly selected”, “naturally the natives are suspicious”, “Mormon King Mitt Romney”, “they’re a bit touchy”, “damage control”, and “spending millions imposing their morality on us”. Naturally, we all should be suspicious too, right?

Mormon Ad BuyThe big conspiracy here is that the LDS Church is always trying to improve their image, no matter where it currently stands, and they’ve been doing it through television commercials since the early seventies. This ad campaign just happens to coincide with the re-launch of LDS website, Mormon.org. Though the author of the Salon.com article tries to argue otherwise, the cities selected for this ad campaign don’t seem to me to be of any electoral advantage, especially when you consider the 2012, election is 27 months out. No, if the LDS really wanted to boost Romney’s chances in 2012 through their positive image campaign they would focus on the Republican Primary states. There is no given that Romney will win the primary – why would the Mormon Church risk millions of dollars trying to promote him for the general election?

So is the Mormon Church trying to push Mitt Romney for President?

“Nothing at all to do with politics, politicians, anything like that,” [Mormon.org marketing director Ron] Wilson said. “I can definitively say this is not connected to Mitt at all.”

Nothing to see here folks, move along.

Perhaps the need to promote public awareness is evident by the fact that the FOX affiliate misspelled the word “Morman” at the 1:25 mark in the video.

More coverage on the ad campaign is provided by a Yahoo.com article by Liz Goodwinwhich is a little more informative and balanced. The article gives some insight into the Mormon ad campaign strategy:

According to Joel Campbell, a Mormon journalism professor at Brigham Young University who is researching the ad campaign, the Utah-based Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints had a TV ad campaign three years ago that tried to explain Mormon beliefs. Research showed that the ads were too “sophisticated” and viewers weren’t getting the message.
[...]
“The church’s desire here is just to tell people who have no opinion or a negative opinion of Mormons to say, Look it, we’re not a bunch of polygamists that wear weird clothes and have a compound in Texas. That’s not us, we’re just regular folks,” Campbell said.
[...]
LDS spokesman Scott Swofford said the church has run ad campaigns for 25 years and has found that the best way to dispel myths about the religion is to have Mormons speak for themselves. The aim of the new campaign is to give Americans “a virtual Mormon neighbor,” he said.

————————————————————–

Of perceptions and being Mormon: Often Mormons can be overly sensitive to the perceptions of others. It seems Nancy French of Evangelicals for Mitt was barraged by some letters of concern when some misunderstood her purposes in linking to the Salon.com article, thinking that she was somehow in accordance with them. She has since clarified, but it shows that Mormons can indeed be “touchy”.

I am a Mormon, and what’s worse is that I’m a Mormon from Utah. My pet peeve is when others assume that I’m for Romney because of that – as if I’m some sort of mindless drone. I don’t like it when people perceive me that way, and granted, I am touchy about that. What I am not touchy about is what happened to the Mormons 160 years ago when the Mormons were “run out of everywhere they were until they ended up settling beside a giant dead salt lake”, as the author of the Salon.com article would have you think.

I completed an LDS mission to the remote land of southern New Jersey 12 years ago. I believe Mormon perception has improved drastically since that time, but I recall very wild things that people supposed about our lifestyle or our teachings. Far too many to list here. With the Mormons having settled in the West, I find that misinformation, or suspicion of Mormons, grows the further East you go. I can’t help but think this is due to the much smaller percentage of Mormons living in these areas. Simply put they are not exposed to Mormons and their so called “normalcy” as much. Thus the ad campaign.

We don’t discuss Romney and his Mormonism here on this blog much, mostly because we don’t feel it very necessary. Sure, Romney did overcome much of the anti-Mormon stigma last time around, and there is certainly some left, but I don’t feel it will have huge impact on the upcoming primaries. If Romney goes into official campaign mode here early next year, my guess is the campaign won’t put as much effort to win over those who might be against him because of his religion. Those who were exposed to him last cycle, and are still against his religion, won’t be won over anytime soon. I think the campaign will wisely move ahead in convincing those whose minds aren’t so made up.

This will probably be the last time you see me tackle the issue of religion, or Mormonism, for a very long time… and I’m glad.

I’m a blogger, I’m a patriot, I’m a sandwich lover, and I’m a tech-enthusiast. I’m Nate Gunderson, and I’m a Mormon.
(Ha. Sorry, I just couldn’t resist.)

Email This Post Email This Post View Printer-Friendly Version View Printer-Friendly Version


(This peer pressure ad is not paid for by Romney's campaign, but we hope you do it anyway!)



Comments Closed

  1. Julie Amoss
    August 12th, 2010 at 17:15 | #1

    The point is? This is not the first church to support a candidate and it won’t be the last. Mormons are their own people for sure. But they are good people with good intentions who work very hard for the good of mankind. What more do you want?

  2. August 12th, 2010 at 17:26 | #2

    @Julie Amoss
    I’m not quite sure you got the point. The fact is that the Mormon church is NOT supporting Mitt Romney. Their ad campaign and the fact that Mitt might run for president next year are not related whatsoever.

  3. Kim
    August 12th, 2010 at 17:29 | #3

    I’m not worried about what the Mormons are doing, I’m worried about what the Muslims are doing!

  4. Julie Amoss
    August 12th, 2010 at 17:33 | #4

    Perhaps.

  5. Julie Amoss
    August 12th, 2010 at 17:35 | #5

    The greater issue of course it what is going on right now. I see you too ignored the Congressional ‘Break’.

  6. Chris
    August 12th, 2010 at 17:36 | #6

    I love the ‘I am a Mormon’ ads that you can pull up on Facebook. It is showing the church in a normal light. Normal families doing normal things.

    I’d be for Mitt even if here were SBC. It just makes sense that setting religion aside, he’s the best we have produced in a long time.

  7. Aaronius
    August 12th, 2010 at 17:42 | #7

    @Julie Amoss I don’t see where the congressional ‘break’ might be relevant in this article. It’s another topic for another day – doesn’t mean its been ignored.

  8. Seth R.
    August 12th, 2010 at 21:03 | #8

    The LDS Church is running the ads because their image is negative among so many Americans. That’s about it.

    It has very little to do with getting Mitt elected. Something of only marginal importance to Salt Lake.

    In fact, I would wager that the leadership of the LDS Church were actually relieved when Mitt Romney DIDN’T make it out of the Primaries. It meant less scrutiny and negative press for the Mormons.

  9. Diana
    August 12th, 2010 at 21:38 | #9

    Do they forget that senator Reid is a Mormon too? Why should they be so suspicious that the church is trying to promote Romney. They are trying to promote Mormonism. There has been a lot of news about the FLDS and people confuse Mormons with them. They just want people to know that WE are everyday people. I am the dental hygienist that cleans your teeth. My son is the tutor that helps you with school. My nephew is the doctor that saved your life in the ER. My husband is the dentist helped your father after he had half his face removed from oral cancer, my daughter is the figure skating teacher that taught your child to skate. We are regular people who just happen to be Mormons, as well. The church encourages education and developing our talents what ever they might be.

  10. Peter
    August 13th, 2010 at 08:37 | #10

    How come the conspiracy seekers seem to be drawn towards the squeaky clean Mormon Church and their advertising. How come they do not go after things like honey nut cheerios that dishonestly implies that highly proceesed sugar coated oats are good for your heart.

    By the way, I have been a Mormon for 35 years and I can tell you that the church does not endorse candidates. They absolutely have no hand in elections, only moral issues. They teach the members to vote for good honest people.

    If Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney were running, I would vote for Newt. He is extremely intelligent and has a better chance of winning the election. This is no time in the history of the US economy to take a chance on maintaining this liberal government.

    Conservatives lost the last presidential election because huckabee stole enough votes from Mitt Romney so that McCain would come out in front. Mitt was the favorite but was diluted by Huckabee. I have the feeling that Huckabee hates Mormons so much that he would rather have Obama elected. But I guess that is a conspiracy theory also.

  11. Chris
    August 13th, 2010 at 08:49 | #11

    Because of newt’s ‘baggage’, He won’t make it out of the primarys.

  12. Stan
    August 13th, 2010 at 16:56 | #12

    Newt’s baggage may be an issue for Mormons but not everyone. There are only about 14 million members in the LDS church. Most of them are well educated and are critical thinkers. That is probably why they joined the Mormon church because critical thinkers need answers and the LDS church has the answers they are seeking. Along with relative objective answers the members are still encouraged to have faith and to live their faith. I agree with the Evangelicals for Mitt and that is Mitt and the other Mormons running for political office need to keep their faith and in turn keep the values that are important to many Americans. Primarily, latter day saints are social conservatives as well as Evangelicals and other critical thinking Americans.

  13. Tracey
    August 14th, 2010 at 05:30 | #13

    Newt has such a condescending tone. He may be highly intelligent but he is hard to listen too.

    Huckabee uses his skills he learned as a preacher to endear his listeners. I absolutely can’t stand him but I understand why his FOLLOWERS adore their PREACHER.

    Mitt Romney has the ability to come across sincere and knowledgeable.

    Last election, Americans did not realize that the economy was heading south until McCain and Obama were the nominees. Now Americans are desperate and many view Romney as someone who is competent in matters of the economy. So, Romney stands a much better chance at being the nominee this go around.

    I think Newts day has passed and Huckabee only appeals to small group of conservatives.

  14. Gammy Sparkles
    August 18th, 2010 at 06:56 | #14

    @Kim
    Well said – My sentiments exactly.

  15. Gammy Sparkles
    August 18th, 2010 at 06:58 | #15

    @Tracey
    But he came across arrogant – not unintelligent, but hard and cold. At least for me. McCain and Obama should not even be said in the same sentence. Obama comes with so much radical baggage, it defies logic that this nation even voted him in. McCain had some areas of concern, but would have lead us in a much different direction! I think we need new blood. Clean Blood. Conservative and common sense blood! Like Mike Pence or Paul Ryan type!

Comments are closed.