David French of EFM on why Romney-care is no Obama-care
I consider Evangelicals for Mitt (EFM) one of the best pro-Mitt blogs out there. They think deeply, write persuasively, and convey as strong a sense of personality and fun as I’ve seen on the blog-o-sphere.
David French, lawyer, veteran, and public servant extraordinaire, has penned what I think is one of the most punchy and persuasive explanations of the differences between what Mitt did in Massachusetts and the PelObaReiDemocratic monstrosity recently inflicted upon our nation.
This is an issue that I have certainly been struggling with, and I know many of you have been too. So I’d recommend that you click over to EFM and read the whole thing. I don’t think this will be the final word by any means, but it is an excellent start, and I would like to thank David for getting the ball rolling on disentangling fact from fiction, attacks from actuality, and reason from ridiculousness.
Email This Post
View Printer-Friendly Version
By far the best analysis of the Romneycare vs. Obamacare discussion I have read to date. This needs to be read by so many other people (though I doubt it will change the minds od the most hardcore Romney detractors).
That last post should have said “one of the best analysis”. SED had an exellent post over at Rightophere.
The author makes some good points. Fair or unfair, the media can inflict grave damage on a politician. Rarely will the media correct the erroneous reporting…..perception becomes reality. Ask Sarah Palin.
EFM gives a very well written and smart analysis of the difference between Mitt Romney and Obama’s HealthCare plan.
I wrote a similar blog outlining the differences between RomneyCare and ObamaCare: http://conservativesamizdat.blogspot.com/2010/03/in-defense-of-romneycare.html